I don’t like creating a separate instance to control disjointedness as it’s not 
immediately visible in the relevant class form. The NodeShape being proposed 
has the same issue.

I usually use a pattern like this:

unnamed:Thing_1
  rdf:type owl:Class ;
  rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing ;
  owl:disjointWith unnamed:Thing_2 ;
  owl:disjointWith unnamed:Thing_3 ;

and then EDG owl2shacl does this: For each owl:disjointWith from class A to B, 
create one constraint at A with the pattern sh:not [ sh:class B ].

You could generate sh:not from the approach you mention too, of course. I did 
not test the mentioned approach but it does appear that it or something similar 
would work.

Also, if Advanced SHACL is supported in your tools a TripleRule could likely 
handle this need.

https://w3c.github.io/shacl/shacl-af/#TripleRule

Cheers,
David

> On 31 Aug 2021, at 13:28, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> 
> (we were looking for an approach not needing rdfs-entailment)
>  
> sml:AllDisjointClasses_1
>   a owl:AllDisjointClasses ;
>   owl:members (
>       sml:PhysicalObject
>       sml:InformationObject
>       sml:Activity
>       sml:Event
>       sml:State
>     ) ;
> .
>  
> In shacl (?):
>  
> sml:DisjointClassesShape_1 a sh:NodeShape ;
>   sh:targetSubjectsOf rdf:type ;
>   sh:property [
>     sh:path ( rdf:type [ sh:zeroOrMorePath rdfs:subClassOf ] ) ;
>     sh:qualifiedValueShape [
>       sh:in (
>         sml:PhysicalObject
>         sml:InformationObject
>         sml:State
>         sml:Event
>         sml:Activity
>       ) ;
>     ] ;
>     sh:qualifiedMaxCount 1 ;
>   ] ;
> .
>  
> Any issues with this mapping?
>  
> Thx Michel
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
> Scientist Specialist
> Structural Reliability
> T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
> M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
> E michel.bo...@tno.nl <mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>    
> Location <http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages. 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/9eedba7e10534409ac1eec4e3d3704b1%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/9eedba7e10534409ac1eec4e3d3704b1%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808‬

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/642FE359-E3CF-4FF8-881E-26AC0C1D201B%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to