#4086: Compare performance of TokenBucketRefillInterval params in simulated
network
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: karsten
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Analysis | Version:
Keywords: performance flowcontrol | Parent: #4465
Points: | Actualpoints:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by robgjansen):
Replying to [comment:32 robgjansen]:
> Following arma's advice in #4486, I suggest we use the large-m2.4xlarge
topology. Its both distributed with Shadow (resource/scallion-
hosts/large-m2.4xlarge.tar.xz) and also exists in the current EC2 image
(~/workspace/large-m2.4xlarge).
I'm changing my mind.
After doing a sample experiment with the large-m2.4xlarge.tar.xz model
distributed with Shadow, I'm now thinking we should use the model from
#6401 instead. The reason is that in my sample experiment, bulk data only
accounts for about 10% of the network load, whereas the PETS 2008 exit
traffic study says it is 40%, and the NSS 2010 study said it was 52%. I've
already analyzed the load to be more approximately correct in the #6401
model.
Sorry to flip-flop. If you've already run the experiments, the results are
probably useful anyway.
Thoughts?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4086#comment:33>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs
