> On 24 Nov. 2016, at 06:09, Jesse V <kernelc...@torproject.org> wrote: > > On 11/23/2016 09:39 AM, David Goulet wrote: >> I agree with you on the fact that ADD_ONION is nice and also crucial to >> hidden >> service as well. That will be addressed with the control port implementation >> of next generation. It's still an undecided part of the engineering work >> which >> is how we are going to proceed with it. Do we change the current >> events/commands to support both v2 and v3? Do we make new events/commands for >> v3? ... (#20699) > > I suggest that we create new commands for v3. This will allow us to > officially deprecate the old APIs and its more intuitive for developers > since the distinction is clearer.
It also makes it easier to maintain backwards compatibility. > This is also a golden opportunity to > change "HiddenServiceX" to "OnionServiceX" if we want to officially > transition the lingo. Yes, that's the plan. (We made the single onion service options start with HiddenService so we could change them all at once.) https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17343 T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev