David Goulet <[email protected]> writes: > Indeed. > > I'm unsure between > "512 Syntax error in command argument" > > "552 Unrecognized entity" > [A configuration key, a stream ID, circuit ID, event, > mentioned in the command did not actually exist.] > > But overall yes!
It looks like the previous code would have done a 512 (when ADD_ONION existed but didn't support authentication yet) so that's probably good here too. ...but, maybe "513 Unrecognized command argument" would be a good candidate, too? ...or even a new one for this case (and future cases) of "recognized, but not yet supported". "560 Not yet implemented" or similar? -- meejah _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
