On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:03 AM, John Case wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Lee wrote: > >>> While I totally get both sides of this argument *in theory*, all of this >>> sounds a lot to me like getting pissed off about someone ringing your >>> doorbell because they didn't mail you an opt-in form first. >> >> Nope. The probes were annoying, but the killer was my all-in-one >> consumer grade router/nat/dhcp server/firewall leaking packets into >> what was supposed to be the secure part of my home network. > > > Ahhh, finally. > > This is the Godwins law of tor-talk - all threads eventually lead to some > moron running a relay from their home Internet connection. > > To be fair, if we let the thread run long enough, I'll bet Mr. > Do-Gooder-Port-Scanner is running from home, too. Comedy from all directions.
I feel that your insults are entirely uncalled for here. Running a relay from a home connection is perfectly fine if there's enough spare bandwidth. There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing just that, and I am thankful to every operator who sets up a good node. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk