On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:07, Mike Perry <mikepe...@torproject.org> wrote: > Please see other replies, but the "backdoor" in question is: > https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/law_enforcement.html
I read the replies and that page — guessed that “backdoor” is meant metaphorically, but thought that perhaps there was an additional technical aspect. What's written there is quite obvious — law enforcement can serve anyone in its jurisdiction a surveillance order. The IPs of Tor relays are known, so the owners of the relays in question can be served with an order just the same. I don't see the principal difference. > This property also prevents JonDos entry and middle nodes from being > "hassle free", as is the case with Tor. Do you mean the added legal liability of being a certified MIX operator? -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute) _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk