On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:28:42 +0100
Mark McCarron <mark.mccar...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> I have been examining the number of what would normally be deemed as
> illegal sites sites on Tor. Eliminating the narcotics trade, as
> these tend to be intelligence agency backed enterprises, a serious
> decline has been noted across the board.
>
> This would tend to suggest that exposure is common place and users no
> longer feel safe. In the more serious categories, such as child porn
> and violent sexual material, no functioning open sites remain and
> many of the sites that require registration are crippled. The entire
> planet has been scrubbed.
>
> This, it would seem, indicates that Tor has been compromised on a
> global scale with very little fanfare or moves to correct the
> situation.
Yep. For instance, the ´owners´ of the original hidden wiki were
somehow forced to censor their own site by some kind of
anonymous clowns.
By anynomous I mean both in the literal sense, and as retards
perhaps related to the clown ´hacker´ ´collective´
¨anonymous¨(tm)
So, how was that done? How do a bunch of script kiddies get to
dictate what the owner of a long standing service does?
>
> Does anyone have any insights into the problem?
I bet that any of the tor apoligists here would fail to provide
any insight into the problem .
They will parrot that
1) tor is open source!!!
2) any compromise of a service hosted in the onion network can
be ´explained´ (away) by PHP exploits.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
