It was not addressed to you but to the thread in general, sorry if I've misquoted.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Err... It was pretty embarrassing and strange... :-/ > > Sorry for asking, Mattia... Do you know that I hate FBI with all my forces > or not? O.o > > Please, you can say everything about me, but do *NOT* say that I support > FBI in any sense. It is really, really offensive for me. > > I hate governments, I admiss, but I never said I am an anarchist and my > work is using laws... :P > > On Jun 7, 2016 5:45 PM, "Mattia" <sowd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Anarchists, you say. Anarchy shall be possible when people are tough > enough > > to respond to violence, and kind enough not to make any violence that > can't > > be defended. > > > > What these "anarchists" are doing is to not be tough enough to face their > > actions, and being so violent that the offended person will never be able > > to defend himself. > > > > Utopia of anarchism is not a world with no laws. Is a world where rules > are > > naturally followed without being enforced. > > And the right to defend oneself after accusations and have a fair trial > is > > a right that is enforced by law in most of those governments that you, > > self-called-anarchists, think are so much better of. > > > > Was this FBI? Are these accusations real? (I have not seen any accusation > > of RAPE, which is profoundly different than having a disturbing > behaviour, > > although many titles use that word). > > It matters up to a certain point. Responses are what concerned me. > > > > People claiming "we don't need proofs, just one accusation of rape is > > enough"... what world do you live in? There's something beyond your > > computer screen and your world made of bits. And in that world, one, 100, > > 10000 anonymous accusations are not enough to destroy a person. > > > > And if this were FBI - well you just made them the huge favour of proving > > the necessity of their existance. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:08 PM, df. <d...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Cecilia Tanaka: > > > > > > > I received some cruel messages in different accounts. I will stalk > > > > my stalkers later, don't worry. It is not about revenge, just > > > > "educational purposes", I swear! :) > > > > > > I am very sad to hear that Cecilia. Let "educational purposes" be > karma. > > > > > > > > > > > Now I am more worried about Jake. If the messages sent for me were > > > > cruel, I can imagine the level of messages sent for Jake. > > > > > > I am sure there are too many to count. > > > > > > I guess for some people when they have no arguments they just resort > > > to unfounded verbal attacks. > > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > > > > df. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk