Actually, I must credit Oscar Wilde for the first sentence.
________________________________ From: Alvaro Coronel <[email protected]> To: Apache Torque Users List <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:37:13 PM Subject: Re: Correct way to getRelatedObjects with each relatedObject reference to this object? One way of getting rid of temptations is yielding. Afterwards you just run the unit tests and tell us how they turned out :) Best regards, Álvaro. ________________________________ From: Brendan Miller <[email protected]> To: Apache Torque Users List <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:57:11 PM Subject: Re: Correct way to getRelatedObjects with each relatedObject reference to this object? Thanks for the comments/interest. In the interim, I'm tempted to add public List#if($enableJava5Features)<$className>#end get${relCol}JoinThis() to Object.vm... Brendan I'm tempted On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:55:19PM +0100, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Brendan Miller wrote: > > Is there a way I can pre-populate the Items' aPurchaseOrder to the > > object I start with (po)? > > This will not provide you with the same instance, but your PurchaseOrder > should have a method called getItemsJoinPurchaseOrder() (or similar) > which will populate your items with the related PurchaseOrder. > > Bye, Thomas. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
