2009/2/12 Douglas Philips <[email protected]>
> On or about 2009 Feb 12, at 12:50 AM, Peer Sommerlund indited:
> > But the real work on translation is to add _() and to make sure
> > translations are distributed and used properly. It would be real
> > nice if you would fork tortoisehg/stable on bitbucket and work on
> > this.
>
> Ok, I am confused.
> I would think a fork would be the last thing wanted given the fierce
> pace of changes.
> Since adding in _() calls is nearly mechanical, and should not change
> the fact that the code is English only now anyways...
> wouldn't it make more sense to fold _()-only changesets in rapidly? I
> could see submitting conversions based on small changes made
> opportunisticly... I must be confused/missing something...
>
Yes, you are right. _() should be harmless and thus is better done on the
main-line.
However, I suspect that some less mechanical changes are also needed. These
are better done on a fork since they may destabilize the code. They can be
developed and tested on the fork (without the full set of _() strings) and
then merged after 0.7 is released.
Regards,
Peer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
