On 07/20/2009 01:35 AM, Steve Borho wrote:
> GPLv2 is the intended license.  I'll adopt Mercurial's header style.
> Do I need to make these changes on the stable branch in order for
> 0.8.N to be considered for inclusion?
>    

I think such a clear statement will be sufficient. Thanks!

But I guess such a no-risk change would be a good candidate for the 
stable branch.

>> A couple of files do seem to be derived from Python. They says "See
>> LICENSE-PSF&  LICENSE for details". That is problematic because there are no
>> such files in TortoiseHg:
>> thgutil/iniparse/config.py
>> thgutil/iniparse/compat.py
>>      
> This is http://code.google.com/p/iniparse/.  We use it entirely
> unmodified.  Bundling it was the simplest solution at the time since
> the project only had a tarfile.  I see they now have .deb and .rpm
> packages so an option would be to simply add iniparse as a dependency
> and add iniparse to thg-installer for Windows builds.
>    

Ok. For now I will just remove them from the package.

As a short term solution I think the missing license files should be 
added to the iniparse directory together with an explanation and 
references to upstream.

/Mads

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop

Reply via email to