On 07/20/2009 01:35 AM, Steve Borho wrote: > GPLv2 is the intended license. I'll adopt Mercurial's header style. > Do I need to make these changes on the stable branch in order for > 0.8.N to be considered for inclusion? >
I think such a clear statement will be sufficient. Thanks! But I guess such a no-risk change would be a good candidate for the stable branch. >> A couple of files do seem to be derived from Python. They says "See >> LICENSE-PSF& LICENSE for details". That is problematic because there are no >> such files in TortoiseHg: >> thgutil/iniparse/config.py >> thgutil/iniparse/compat.py >> > This is http://code.google.com/p/iniparse/. We use it entirely > unmodified. Bundling it was the simplest solution at the time since > the project only had a tarfile. I see they now have .deb and .rpm > packages so an option would be to simply add iniparse as a dependency > and add iniparse to thg-installer for Windows builds. > Ok. For now I will just remove them from the package. As a short term solution I think the missing license files should be added to the iniparse directory together with an explanation and references to upstream. /Mads ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop