On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Rusek <ste...@rusek.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 17:18, Steve Borho <st...@borho.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote: >>> On 30.11.2009 01:56, Steve Borho wrote: >>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 29.11.2009 20:35, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: >>>>>> There, it is now awaiting future "infections" by the new feature stream >>>>>> in default. Until the whole surprise package gets pushed out on >>>>>> Feb 1st :) (and until then, the whole package is mostly ignored by the >>>>>> majority of the users. Because we told them it is "unstable"). >>>>> Just noticed: 0.10 will be March, 1st 2010 (not Feb 1st). >>>>> >>>>> So unless the Windows shell cmenu fixes are backported to the stable >>>>> branch, >>>>> they will appear in a release on March, 1st earliest. >>>> >>>> Are you lobbying for them to make it into 0.9.1? >>> >>> Partly. Also analyzing and trying to improve our workflows. >>> >>>> They do fix a number of bugs, so this is an option. >>> >>> Yes. The shell extension fixes for the cmenu should go into a bugfix >>> release of 0.9. They should have gone into stable from the beginning. >>> >>> Problem is: I can't test it on Windows 7 final (I don't have that here). >>> >>> So if you can test it on Windows 7 final, then I'm all for squeezing >>> it into 0.9.1. >>> >>> I can do the testing on Windows XP 32 and Vista 64 Business. >>> >>> And if we really should manage to screw up 0.9.1 (just in case, >>> I don't expect that to happen), we can still do a quick 0.9.2. >>> >>> Or we delay 0.9.1 for a couple of days until an RC has been >>> tested by others. >> >> The goal for 0.9 is to follow Mercurial's monthly release schedule for >> point releases, so 0.9.2 will release with hg-1.4.2 on Jan 1. >> >> I'm tempted to transplant the cmenu changes to stable after 0.9.1 to >> give them a month of 'soak in' with stable nightly builds. >> >> -- >> Steve Borho >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Tortoisehg-develop mailing list >> Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop >> > > I am running Win 7 final x64, I would be glad to test the cmenu fixes, > only problem is I got in on this group too late to know exactly what > they are trying to fix. So if someone could tell me what I am looking > for, I will gladly test and report.
Issue #466. On Vista and above, using owner drawn menus causes the OS to fallback to a least-common-denominator rendering technique. It causes a number of artifacts that are detailed in that issue. -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
