On 27.03.2010 19:11, Sune Foldager wrote: > Always strive for something better :-). It's somewhat complex now, yes, > but I've seen much worse.
A remark regarding complexity: I imagine *testing* minor upgrades (in Windows Installer terms) would be quite time consuming: Making sure files are exchanged as expected. BTW: Having correct monotonically increasing file versions would help a lot here. See my diverse precautionary perennial messages on the lists about Windows exe-, dll- and msi-file versions and the Windows Installer rules for exchanging files in minor installs. Here is the list of platforms we expect the installers to be tested on: Windows XP x86 SP3 Windows XP x64 SP2 Windows Vista x86 SP2 Windows Vista x64 SP2 Windows 7 x86 Windows 7 x64 (I'm testing 'Ultimate' only on Vista/Windows 7, 'Professional' on XP). "Contributors" for installer testing are always welcome (or any other area of course). BTW, my thanks again to the guys at Microsoft CodePlex who organized a sponsored MSDN Premium subscription for one year for me, which allows me to test on these platforms (thanks to the Windows test licenses included). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
