On 04.01.2009 10:38, TK Soh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Zorba <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks guys, I think it was me who opened up the discussion on the mercurial >> users list, at the same time as I wrote this post. This post has only just >> appeared here even though I wrote it a few days ago (got held up waiting for >> me to authorise membership). >> >> Thanks for that - I'll wait for THg 0.6 and may decide to convert the 1.1.x >> repo's back in the meantime if it looks like it will be a while. > > If possible, we hope to release 0.6 within the two weeks. It should be > linked to the newly released Mercurial 1.1.2.
That sounds great. Maybe http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew-stable/rev/f1af59451c0c should be considered for inclusion in Thg 0.6. f1af59451c0c fixes http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue1433 which has 'critical' priority. f1af59451c0c seems to fix a bug that seems to have been introduced with the refactoring http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew-stable/rev/716a1296e182 However, I'm not sure if it's really that critical. BTW, thanks a lot for not releasing 1.1 (which contains bug http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue1417 committed by idiot me -- is fixed in 1.1.1). 1.1 was a pretty big step by the way... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
