On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote: > As promised, I've gone through all of the feature requests and bug > reports on SourceForge and closed them all one way or another. Many > were moved to Bitbucket outright, many were combined together if they > were common, many were closed because they were already fixed, many > were closed because the originator never responded to questions, and a > few were closed because they were anonymous requests with no feedback. > > If you feel I've shorted your bug, open a new one on Bitbucket. > > The old bugs are still searchable on SF, if you want to read them.
IMHO, the trackers that were moved should include the URL pointing to each other. This will make it easier for users to navigate around the history and follow the issues. Also, some of the issues on BB that include simple line like "ID 1844721" may not be clear to users what it really means. "SF Bug 1844721" is better, but then again, a URL to original SF tracker will be very useful. I also feel that marking the relocated issues as "Closed" may lead to some confusion. They aren't really closed. Just moved. Maybe another status on SF that can better reflect the fact? Just my 2-cent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
