The verification of the Stable Release Update for binutils has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603137

Title:
  libbfd changed name without transition

Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in binutils source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]
  the latest binutils update in xenial to 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04 changed the 
name of the libbfd library from: libbfd-2.26-system.so to 
libbfd-2.26.1-system.so
  This apparently happened without transitioning all dependencies.
  For example it broke the perf tool from the linux-tools-common package as it 
is still linked against the old libbfd name.

  To reproduce run "perf" with linux >= 4.4.0-24.43 and binutils
  2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04 and you get an cannot open libbfd-2.26-system.so
  error.

  [Test case]
  1. Install eztrace on 16.04.
  2. Install binutils from xenial-updates.
  3. Run 'eztrace'.  Confirm that this fails with a library error.
  4. Install binutils from xenial-proposed.
  5. Run 'eztrace'.  Confirm that this gives usage output instead of failing 
with a library error.

  [Regression potential]
  Packages which depend on libbfd-2.26-system.so are currently broken with the 
binutils in xenial-updates.  No packages appear to have been built yet against 
the libbfd-2.26.1-system.so soname.  Therefore the regression potential is 
minimal.  The solution is intended to be compatible with both upstream sonames, 
so that any future packages which do rebuild against the 2.26.1 soname will 
have a versioned dependency on binutils (>= 2.26.1), binutils (<= 2.27).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1603137/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to