So if one saves the result of a debdiff as a 'name.diff' file, then
opening it with nano should colour most things already in an appropriate
and expected way, no?  Or are there things missing that really should be
coloured too?  Could someone attach a sample file?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300565

Title:
  please syntax highlight debdiff files

Status in nano package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  nano source highlights diff and patch files.  It would be nice if it
  did the same with debdiff files.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/1300565/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to