usch;505937 Wrote: > From the dimensions given in the 'Wiki' > (http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison) it is smaller > than the Classic. A little bit taller perhaps, but much less wide. > > I think they purposely take the pictures in a way that makes the units > appear bigger than they are. When I unpacked my Boom I was surprised how > small it is, too.
Does this help at all? It's about 1/4" taller, 1 1/2" less wide. The angle of the face is tipped back quite a bit more than the SB3/Classic and the screen is noticeably optimized for viewing from a higher angle, which should work well for those using the touch interface. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: touch.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=9042| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73231 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
