On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:28:57AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:42:58AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 08:47:04AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > Right, thanks for the explanation and I'm able to reproduce it on my own > > > work laptop now: > > > > > > [ 0.708272] resource sanity check: requesting [mem > > > 0xfed10000-0xfed15fff], which spans more than pnp 00:01 [mem > > > 0xfed10000-0xfed13fff] > > > [ 0.708302] [<ffffffff8108548a>] ? iomem_map_sanity_check+0xba/0xd0 > > > > > > Luckily we have this fixed (in two commits) in 4.5. > > > > We do? I don't recall seeing a commit that changes the 0x1000 > > Ignore our fixes do not do anything to this. And it does not even occur > my laptop (that was a different case). Should think before pressing. > Apologies. I'll push a fix as soon to master.
Actually this does make things right, doesn't it? https://github.com/jsakkine/linux-tpmdd/commit/1bd047be37d95bf65a219f4931215f71878ac060 struct resource new_res = { .start = start, .end = start + size - 1, .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, }; /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
