On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:22:27PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:28:57AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:42:58AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 08:47:04AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > Right, thanks for the explanation and I'm able to reproduce it on my own > > > > work laptop now: > > > > > > > > [ 0.708272] resource sanity check: requesting [mem > > > > 0xfed10000-0xfed15fff], which spans more than pnp 00:01 [mem > > > > 0xfed10000-0xfed13fff] > > > > [ 0.708302] [<ffffffff8108548a>] ? iomem_map_sanity_check+0xba/0xd0 > > > > > > > > Luckily we have this fixed (in two commits) in 4.5. > > > > > > We do? I don't recall seeing a commit that changes the 0x1000 > > > > Ignore our fixes do not do anything to this. And it does not even occur > > my laptop (that was a different case). Should think before pressing. > > Apologies. I'll push a fix as soon to master. > [SNIP did not make sense]
Right, this was confusing because it requests something that is not multiple of than page size :) So would the right thing to do change it request size of the control area structure (in the call site of crb_map_res)? /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
