I put a very simple and probably naive patch that is essentially a verbose port of what AutoQuery does currently. See:
http://trac-hacks.org/attachment/ticket/3226/autoquery_patch_vs_r7289.txt Please let me know if this is sufficient or if you want me to do any clean up. Also, should I ticket this on t.e.o.? (and of course, the patcher is welcome to make any improvements necessary to my code) thanks Jeff Hammel The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org On Jun 20, 10:41 am, Jeff Hammel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:18:01AM +1000, Alec Thomas wrote: > > > 2008/6/20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I vote for Trac being shipped with a package of commonly used plugins > > > (AccountManager, AutoQueryPlugin, IniAdmin etc.). > > > AutoQueryPlugin is a perfect example of the effort surrounding > > including plugins in Trac. I'm not bashing the author, but the major > > blocker is mentioned on the plugins page: "This plugin overrides the > > ticket.html template to do this. Ideally, this wouldn't have to be > > done, but it was the easiest solution to the problem." > > > This plugin couldn't be shipped with Trac with that approach. > > > TBH, this would be better implemented as a patch against trunk. If one > > were provided it would likely be included. > > Now that I know that such a patch would be welcome and likely to be included, > I'll work on it after returning from vacation: > > http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/3226 > > jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
