"Erik Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I was wondering the other day if it would be possible to change the
>>> syncing algorithm, by having it run "in the background", and while it is
>>> running, to get data from the repository directly for requests.
>>
>> I think that the few cases where a manual resync are required is not
>> worth adding the complexity of managing a background thread.
>> These manual resync usually follow admin tasks, so IMHO the current
>> implementation is good enough.
>
> If anything, spawning a separate process to do it would make more
> sense than a thread. But I agree that manual resyncs are uncommon
> enough that it's not worth the effort.
There is one use case that might warrant the background resync.
- server hosts multiple trac environments
- all environments have their respective TRAC_ADMINs
- server has no TRAC_ADMIN shell accounts
(or TRAC_ADMINs that are lost at the command-line :-()
Just a thought,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS Corporation
FSF Associate Member #1962 Help support software freedom
http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=1962
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
