On Nov 13, 12:43 pm, "Emmanuel Blot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > would it make sense that trac automatically resyncs, if it already
> > knows that a resync would be necessary?
>
> I see at least one issue:
> resync can take a very long time to complete, far longer than a
> typical web request timeout...

and the problem would be what?  the "of course i like stack trace much
more, it is so helpful. i know immediately something is broken and i
can better bother the admin who then has to log in and start it on the
command line. and of course other users as well should get this
informative stack trace until the resync has completed" ?



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to