Michael Jones wrote:
> I just want to suggest that since the milestone delivery dates aren't
> accurate, that they be modified to reflect a new time estimate, or
> removed altogether. I'm prompted to suggest this because some people
> that I've recommended Trac to have complained that Trac development is
> dead, because of the due-date times on the roadmap page.

I tend to agree with that. Removing the due dates altogether has the
disadvantage that the corresponding milestones wouldn't necessarily
appear at the top of the list anymore. But we can certainly adjust the
due dates. I have updated them to reflect reality to some degree.

-- Remy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to