On 9/12/2011 10:11 PM, Remy Blank wrote:
Michael Jones wrote:
I just want to suggest that since the milestone delivery dates aren't
accurate, that they be modified to reflect a new time estimate, or
removed altogether. I'm prompted to suggest this because some people
that I've recommended Trac to have complained that Trac development is
dead, because of the due-date times on the roadmap page.
I tend to agree with that. Removing the due dates altogether has the
disadvantage that the corresponding milestones wouldn't necessarily
appear at the top of the list anymore. But we can certainly adjust the
due dates. I have updated them to reflect reality to some degree.
But then, how will we be able to say "oops, we're X years late" accurately?
:-) More seriously, we should try to get the ball rolling once again
with the releases, we have some good stuff pending in both the stable
and development branches.
I've updated previously TracDev/ToDo to reflect that, my estimation was
somehow more optimistic than Remy's (0.12.3 by end of this month and
0.13 by end of this year). We'll see ;-)
-- Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
