On 1/7/2012 6:07 PM, Grzegorz Sobanski wrote: > * Christian Boos<[email protected]> [2012-01-07 17:13]: > [...] >> But it's not what we need to do here. First, we don't have a >> DVCS, so in Subversion the only choice left for reintegrating is > [...] > > Maybe it is a good time to drop SVN as main repository for trac > and move fully to DVCS? > >
Well, then we would argue endlessly about which one to use ;-) I think the current approach is not so bad, as we have a reference in Subversion and mirrors in both git and Mercurial. Besides the external mirrors, we even have "in-house" work repositories for the Trac committers, which are included as repositories in t.e.o. We might do that for git as well. So until we get really a ton more activity and it would become obvious that staying with svn would slow us down, I don't see the urge to move. If future versions of Trac would greatly improve the support for DVCS specific workflows, then of course it would become a different matter... -- Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
