Peter Suter wrote: > I'm wondering, would it be best to drop `future27.py` entirely? It only > defines (and tests) `namedtuple`, which is only used once to define > `Storage.RevCache`.
I haven't looked at the code closely, but if it's indeed the only use case, then yes, defining the class explicitly would be even better. > Which leaves, roughly categorized: (... snip list ...) > Probably we can merge some more of these as duplicates. That's probably not enough to warrant writing an exporter and importer, so I guess some copy / pasting of ticket descriptions is in order. Make sure to reference the original ticket in the description of each new one, so you don't need to copy the comments. -- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
