On Monday, March 25, 2013 5:19:26 AM UTC-7, Chris Nelson wrote: > > > I'm asking for your opinions here. > > > > Do you feel, that new time fields should in general use the new POSIX > > microseconds format, or is it ok to use seconds, if the extra precision > > doesn't matter, i.e. no change tracking like done for ticket changes? If > > I understood correctly, this was the main reason behind the move to > > microseconds for Trac time field. > > ... > > There's no harm in having a bunch of 0s at the end of your time stamp > if all you need is second resolution but there is lot to be gained > from consistent format. I'd vote for all microseconds. >
What Chris says makes sense to me, so I'd also suggest going with microseconds unless the Trac devs suggest differently. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
