-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27.03.2013 02:24, RjOllos wrote: > On Monday, March 25, 2013 5:19:26 AM UTC-7, Chris Nelson wrote: > > I'm asking for your opinions here. > > > > Do you feel, that new time fields should in general use the new POSIX > > microseconds format, or is it ok to use seconds, if the extra > precision > > doesn't matter, i.e. no change tracking like done for ticket > changes? If > > I understood correctly, this was the main reason behind the move to > > microseconds for Trac time field. > > ... > > There's no harm in having a bunch of 0s at the end of your time stamp > if all you need is second resolution but there is lot to be gained > from consistent format. I'd vote for all microseconds. > > > What Chris says makes sense to me, so I'd also suggest going with > microseconds unless the Trac devs suggest differently.
Thanks, already going that direction. Steffen Hoffmann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFSpdsACgkQ31DJeiZFuHd5twCfXYybKLR9eJvO69XXzcK2Q60J NOoAoISdL6d+uBuXXdSU+L/kWKQDnHFh =n1Al -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
