On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Christian Boos <[email protected]>wrote: [...]
> The "ideal" model I had in mind for working > with Transifex hasn't happened (beyond french and japanese), and that > model was to have a language maintainer being both the Transifex team > coordinator and the Trac committer. fwiw ... few days ago I've requested to join the Spanish lang team @ transifex and would not mind to be the coordinator , if considered appropriate , I could also work towards the goal of becoming a committer ... btw, what are the steps to get there ? > The "second best" way was to have a > process in place for regularly integrating all the changes from > Transifex into Trac, and this hasn't worked out either, as it's quite a > lot of work and I haven't been able to keep the pace with that. > > There were two things that prevented us to fully automate this > integration. One was that we still got the occasional direct commits > from translators, and therefore integrating updates from Transifex > required some kind of manual merge (as described in [1]). We could get > rid of this problem by enforcing the updates to come exclusively through > Transifex. fwiw ... +1 [...] -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
