On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > The two things that I'd like to see long term (separate from what should > be in 1.2 or when there will be code) are: > > Integration of ticket dependencies into the base; this seems too > fundamental to make optional. There are two kinds of dependencies: > one is parent/child for hierarchical WBS (for task/enhancement > tickets), and the other is blocking (for those, or for defects). With > mastertickets you can one or the other, or have it be a little > confused and do both. >...
We use MasterTickets for blocking and Subtickets for WBS. It works quite well for us. Though I agree core support would be preferable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
