On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:31:44 AM UTC-8, cboos wrote:
>
> Hello everybody, 
>
> I took some steps to finalize my migration of Trac to the Jinja2 
> template engine, and the results are now visible in several places. 
>
> The latest code is in the jinja2-trunk-r15341 branch: 
>
>    https://svn.edgewall.org/git/trac/devs/cboos 
>    https://github.com/cboos/trac.git 
>
> A demo instance is available: 
>
>    https://trac.edgewall.org/testing 
>
>    (this one also contains my wiki-restyling changes, for good measure) 
>
> The #12649 ticket can be used to report trivial issues you'd find with 
> Jinja2 (#12640 for the restyling ones). Don't hesitate to create new 
> tickets for more serious issues, if any. 
>
> It would be nice to get some feedback at this point. You can contribute 
> by either reviewing the code, or simply by playing around in 
> t.e.o/testing and report any glitches you'd find there. 
>
> If you have any questions, the mailing list would probably be more 
> appropriate. Be sure to first go through the following wiki pages, as 
> they may already contain the answer you're looking for: 
>
>  - https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/Jinja 
>  - https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/PortingFromGenshiToJinja 
>
>
> Known "issues" so far: 
>
>  - the branch keeps Genshi templates and Jinja2 templates side by side 
> (e.g. search.html and jsearch.html); that was helpful during the 
> development, and can still be useful while reviewing the branch, but I'm 
> going to go back to the original names soon (jsearch.html -> 
> search.html), moving a step closer to the merge. 
>
>  - I haven't tested the i18n support for Jinja2 templates in plugins 
> yet; this is what I'm going to work on next 
>
>
> Also, I want to address the concerns raised last year about the backward 
> compatibility with Genshi. I propose to use the whole 1.4.x series as a 
> transition period, during which both template engines will be supported. 
> The plugins making use of Genshi templates won't need to be changed a 
> bit, while those which want to port to or start using Jinja2 templates 
> will have to use a new API: `IRequestHandler.process_request` methods 
> will have to return a `(template, data)` pair instead of the legacy 
> `(template, data, None)` triple. There's slightly more to it than this, 
> but you get the idea. 
>
> I've also taken into account the plugins which inject content in 
> generated pages via the ITemplateStreamFilter interface. That way is 
> deprecated in favor of using JavaScript for that purpose, but the 
> interface will nevertheless be supported during the transition period as 
> well. 
>
> One problem is that this ITemplateStreamFilter support mostly works, but 
> is not perfect, and of course kills most of the speed improvement 
> brought by the switch to Jinja2. Consider this as an incentive to 
> migrate such plugins! If people are really motivated to fix/enhance this 
> aspect, feel free to do so, but I feel it's somewhat counter-productive 
> to invest more energy there. 
>
> I hope we can soon finalize the integration of this effort, before we 
> make more serious moves on the Python3 topic (also, Jinja2 brings in six 
> as a dependency). 
>
> -- Christian 
>


One more possible minor quirk: the level 3 headings from the TracIni macro 
extend outside the #wikipage div:
https://trac.edgewall.org/testing/wiki/TracIni#attachment-max_zip_size-option

- Ryan 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to