Just want clarify that I meant the relative numbers should be used in the database, not in UI. There is nothing that prevents using the current comment:3-form in the user interface while referencing one comment to another using a relative number in the database.
/Philip > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The comment numbers are not just used in the database, they may also be > used in comments to link to other comments e.g. "see comment:1 and > comment:2". Using relative numbers in the comment links would probably > be confusing for users. And you can't use relative numbers in the > anchor links (the ¶ link next to the author's name). Additionally, > comments could be deleted (using the TicketDeletePlugin on > trac-hacks.org or similar functionality included in a future version), > which would break relative numberings. > > So, relative numbers would cause a variety of problems. Unique numbers > could work, but they would be rather inconvenient for use in links: "See > comment:3757593". > > So, the question is: why do you need to add comments to the top or > bottom of a ticket? Maybe there's a better way to accomplish your goal > without breaking the comment numbering. > > -- > Matthew Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Trac-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev > > _______________________________________________ Trac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev
