Jason, For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be found. Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if it's impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The directions are a bunch of "with this version you use this version and then that version has its dependencies." It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 but I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all the problems I have mentioned.
Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw in the towel here. -----Original Message----- >From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM >To: trac-users@googlegroups.com >Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC > > >Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say >that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly >it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can >be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you >need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you >through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install, >in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL + >Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly >install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache. > >Jason > >-----Original Message----- >From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed >Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM >To: trac-users@googlegroups.com >Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC > > >Jason, > Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my >hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much! > >-----Original Message----- >>From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:39 PM >>To: trac-users@googlegroups.com >>Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits >> >> >>Well, trac "easy install" (with the quotes results in 10,500 hits :), >so >>it is about 80% easy to install. >> >>Jason >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed >>Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:12 PM >>To: Trac Users >>Subject: [Trac] TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits >> >> >>Well, this really explains it: EVERYBODY thinks it's impossible to >>install TRAC. >> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
