This should have said "sooner than later". Greg
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 10:13 -0400, Greg Dickie wrote: > I'd just like to add my vote for this happening sooner or later. One > thing we did to workaround some of those requirements is to add a custom > field called Verified. Its a checkbox so we can kind of get the same > functionality as an actual verified state... > > Maybe this can work for you too? Trac is very cool (we just deployed it) > and moving fast so I wouldn't switch unless you have to. > > Thanks, > Greg > > > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 08:43 -0500, Russ Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is increasing pressure within our company for a ticketing system > > that will do what I know the new Flexible Workflow will do. Is there any > > idea as to how long it will be before this hits trunk? We run off trunk > > but would rather not have to deal with managing patches on top of it if > > it can be avoided. > > > > My worry at this point is that if it's going to be too long, we may end > > up switching to some other system, which is something that I personally > > would rather not do. > > > > Anyway, the pressure is building, so any estimate would be helpful. > > > > Thanks. > > -- Greg Dickie just a guy Maximum Throughput _______________________________________________ Trac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
