Hi guys,
As I have previously noted (and been flamed for to some extent :)),
trac is only useful for us with the workflow. I have been using the
sandbox for a quite long time now and it has caused me very little
concern. I have been impressed with the speed with which the
maintainers patches changes from trunk into the sandbox. No problem
there at all.
At one time it was broken, but I run my trac on a different machine
so I can test and verify trac on my machine before it is deployed. I
always keep a copy of the previous binary install file, should there
be a problem that I cannot circumvent; then it is easy to roll back
using previous binary. This off course provided that the update did
not require a database upgrade, in which case I would test my copy
vigorously before deploying.
All in all we have enjoyed the workflow version with very little
trouble.
Sincerely,
Philip Bergen
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Russ Brown wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:28 +0200, Manuzhai wrote:
Thanks. So we could be looking at 4 weeks before it gets merged to
trunk? That would be lovely. :)
If you have no qualms about running trunk, why don't you just run the
workflow branch?
How frequently are changes to trunk merged to the Workflow branch?
Regards,
Manuzhai
_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
--
_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
