Jamie McCracken wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:23 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: >> Jamie McCracken wrote: >>> Could we also reduce memory usage by not statically linking to the >>> private libs libtracker-common and libtracker-db? >> Those libraries should not be available for public use. Before doing so, >> each API would have to be: >> >> a) Documented >> b) Checked it needs to be public >> c) Versioned >> d) ... >> >> This is a lot of work and I don't think it is worth it. >> I haven't looked at the footprints myself though. > > > why we would do all that? > > we would not be exporting the headers for those libs so no other apps > outside of tracker source tree will be able to use it effectively > > surely there are some examples of private libs that are not statically > linked?
I mis-understood clearly. I thought you meant make it public for public use. I think making them .so libs but privately used is a good idea. -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
