Jamie McCracken wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:23 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: >> Jamie McCracken wrote: >>> Could we also reduce memory usage by not statically linking to the >>> private libs libtracker-common and libtracker-db? >> Those libraries should not be available for public use. Before doing so, >> each API would have to be: >> >> a) Documented >> b) Checked it needs to be public >> c) Versioned >> d) ... >> >> This is a lot of work and I don't think it is worth it. >> I haven't looked at the footprints myself though. >> >>> currently my FTS module and the file-indexer-module are ~ 1MB in size >>> due mostly to linking with them and im sure the size of trackerd and >>> tracker-indexer could be made smaller too with only one instance of >>> those libs in memory >> How does the memory footprint compare to the old tracker? >> > > having looked at the contents of libtracker-common, most of the memory > used is for the stemmers - we load them all into memory even though we > only use one of them. i think making each language stemmer a dynamically > loaded module should help reduce things
I can look into doing this. -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
