On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:12 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> am I the only one still getting this:

Unfortunately, I still haven't found any way to reproduce this here, and
looking at valgrind log and code I haven't been able to find the cause
for the leak, either. Can you isolate whether it's caused by filesystem
indexing, mail indexing (evolution or kmail), or by operations after
initial indexing?

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:29, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe<tshep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 18:29, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe<tshep...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 17:22, Jürg Billeter<j...@bitron.ch> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:52 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 14:37, Jürg Billeter<j...@bitron.ch> wrote:
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 13:24 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >>>> >> Seems there's some bad leak in tracker-store; top claims it's upwards
> >>>> >> of 300MB of RAM while valgrind output is summarised below. For a full
> >>>> >> log, please find attached.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm still having trouble, and firing this:
> >>>> G_DEBUG=gc-friendly G_SLICE=always-malloc valgrind --leak-check=full
> >>>> --show-reachable=yes --leak-resolution=high
> >>>> --log-file=/home/wena/valgrind.log /usr/libexec/tracker-store
> >>>>
> >>>> gives the attached results which are summarised thus:
> >>>> =9401== LEAK SUMMARY:
> >>>> ==9401==    definitely lost: 160 bytes in 2 blocks
> >>>> ==9401==    indirectly lost: 120 bytes in 10 blocks
> >>>> ==9401==      possibly lost: 345,371,316 bytes in 5,516,447 blocks
> >>>> ==9401==    still reachable: 28,586,598 bytes in 590,824 blocks
> >>>> ==9401==         suppressed: 4,912 bytes in 120 blocks
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible that you still have an old evolution push module in
> >>> $prefix/lib/tracker-0.7/push-modules/daemon/?
> >>
> >> Got rid of the whole dir ($prefix/lib/tracker-0.7/) just to make sure
> >> and re-ran "make install".
> >
> > someone still looking at this? find attached what's summarised thus:
> >
> > ==11435== LEAK SUMMARY:
> > ==11435==    definitely lost: 160 bytes in 2 blocks
> > ==11435==    indirectly lost: 120 bytes in 10 blocks
> > ==11435==      possibly lost: 489,585,033 bytes in 6,145,336 blocks
> > ==11435==    still reachable: 2,154,829 bytes in 5,659 blocks
> > ==11435==         suppressed: 4,996 bytes in 122 blocks


_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list

Reply via email to