|--==> "KG" == Kai Gro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  KG> I meant the case where user/host is given in one file, but not in
  KG> both files.  But I think that's not what I said :-(

OK, I think I might be coming around to your way of thinking...

(make-symbolic-link "/[user@host]/path/file" 
                    "/path/symlink")
  => FILENAME -> remote;  LINKNAME -> local

(make-symbolic-link "/path/file" 
                    "/[user@host]/path/symlink")
  => FILENAME -> local;  LINKNAME -> remote

(make-symbolic-link "/[user@host]/path/file" 
                    "/[user@host]/path/symlink")
  => FILENAME -> remote;  LINKNAME -> remote

(make-symbolic-link "/path/file" 
                    "/path/symlink")
  => FILENAME -> local;  LINKNAME -> local

But I'm still not convinced that a symlink that spans different hosts
is a good idea.  It might be OK when done via NFS, but in that
situation the remote filesystem is mounted locally.

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
|            XEmacs - It's not just an editor.             |
|                    It's a way of life.                   |
|------------------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>---|

_______________________________________________
Tramp-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel

Reply via email to