On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:23:24 +0100 Steve Hosgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > It seems for instance that 'transcode' has a "direct capture from V4L" > mode, but I've not sussed it out as yet. Comments welcome. Would that > give me a better route for digitising from analogue? I'm a regular user of direct v4l2 capture (and I'm highly interested on this area) but I'm not experience at all of NuppelVideo, so I can't do any comparison. A/V sync it's good with a *very* few problems on modern machines, even if this depends from the capture card. Generally speaking, using v4l capture allow to the user to do more transformations on the fly, if host CPU is fast enough :) For example, I do deinterlacing on the fly when recording (maybe this is possible even with NuppelVideo recorder, I don't know :P). Anyway, there is a fairly detailed command line example on our wiki, take a look if you want to try v4l direct capture. Best regards, -- Francesco Romani - Ikitt ['people always complain, no matther what you do'] IM contact: (email-me, I have antispam default deny!) icq://27-83-87-867 some known bugs: http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?Bug_Showcase
