Phil Ehrens wrote: > > >> I wonder if it wouldn't be preferable for the file size > >> option to be taken as a scaling factor, i.e. 600Mb per hour > >> of material instead of per input file. > >> > >> > > > >Jeff Hyche wrote: > > I have not thought of that, and I'm not exactly sure how to do it. I'm also > > not sure of how much better it would be than what I'm doing. One thing that > > I'm thinking for doing is instead of file size, do a bpp setting. If you > > don't input a file size the program will generate a bitrate based on the bpp > > ration being around 0.2. > > fsize=`bc << _EOF > $seconds*$mbytes/3600 > _EOF > `
You may also find that tomsmocomp with the default options gives you better deinterlacing results.
