Jeff Hyche wrote: > > > > Would not the bpp option that I 'm thinking of do just about the same > > > thing? > > > > No, bpp is just a trap waiting to bite you. > > > > Note that by top-posting you are making it difficult for people to > > follow the thread. Please stop top-posting. > > > > Then it might be in the best interest to keep the bpp as a "safty" feature > like someone suggested. If it detects that the bpp are going to be to low > it flags it and issues a warning.
I admit to having no idea what the bpp reported by transcode actually means. When I use transcode I only ever see two values of bpp, if I recall correctly they are 0.174 and 0.214. They seem to have no significance when the results are examined. Somebody who knows more about it may have something meaningful to add.
