On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:37:18 +0000 Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I'm subscribed to transcode-devel and transcode-users for about a month now > and have not yet seen a mail in transcode-devel, so I post this here on > transcode-users. Please tell me, if this was wrong. Well, our developers are pretty busy with real-life works, but there is still some activity even, unfortuntely, at lower rate than desired. on transco-devel we usually discuss relevant (architectural) changes, maintenance and routine work go directly on CVS yet. Anyway, patches are very welcome, but they should go on -devel. Don't worry too much if noone posts, there almost ever is somebody lurking ;) > On PowerPC64 you cannot define __s32 and such definitions without risking > to redefine them, because they are already defined in linux kernel headers. > The correct way would be using posix versions like int32_t and such. And that's should be the way we go (and the way I like much). Unfortunately there is stilla bunch of dark corners in our codebase. > Would be fine to have this patch included. Unfortunatly the patch attached > to this mail is not the patch included in gentoo, because I had to adopt it > so it can be applied to HEAD. > Comments? RTJpegN part looks fine for me and I'm going to commit it if Andrew likes it too. videodev.h headers are a different story. They are supposed to be an exact copy of real kernel (linux) v4l header. Can't remember yet why they are bundled at time, but I'd like from long time to drop them and use system header instead. I'll investigate on this later. Best regards, -- Francesco Romani - Ikitt ['people always complain, no matther what you do'] IM contact : (email first, Antispam default deny!) icq://27-83-87-867 known bugs : http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?Bug_Showcase tiny homepage : http://fromani.exit1.org (see IDEAS if you want send code!)
