>RTJpegN part looks fine for me and I'm going to commit it if Andrew likes it
>too.
Sorry, I can't accept it (this was the main library I was referring to
in my previous post) unless either: a new version of RTjpeg comes out that
uses the proper types, or somebody (maybe me, if I ever find the time for
it) reimplements RTjpeg from scratch for transcode. I really don't want to
have to deal with local copies of libraries at all, much less local copies
that have been patched... remember all the problems with lavc?
--Andrew Church
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://achurch.org/
