Why not just make it lazy all the time? Seems to me like you're just doubling your effort from not much gain.
Mark On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Andrew <am2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is doing this a bad idea? > > <object name="Thingy" table="thingy" sequence="THINGY_KEY_SEQ"> > <id name="id" type="numeric" column="key_num"/> > <property name="a" type="string" column="a"/> > > .... > > <onetomany name="AnotherThiny" lazy="true"> > <link to="thingies.AnotherThingy" > column="another_thingy_id"/> > <collection type="array"> > <order property="thingyNumber" order="asc"/> > </collection> > </onetomany> > </object> > > <object name="PopulatedThingy" table="thingy" > sequence="THINGY_KEY_SEQ"> > <id name="id" type="numeric" column="key_num"/> > <property name="a" type="string" column="a"/> > > ..... > > <onetomany name="AnotherThingy" lazy="false"> > <link to="thingies.AnotherThingy" > column="another_thingy_id"/> > <collection type="array"> > <order property="thingyNumber" order="asc"/> > </collection> > </onetomany> > </object> > > > So if I want to use lazy loading I use the "Thingy" object, but if I > want to get a fully populated object I use the "PopulatedThingy" > object. > > It works, but is it good practice? > > > -- E: mark.man...@gmail.com T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
