On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 20:31, David W. Aquilina wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:21:46PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: > > Personally I would use an OpenBSD box in Bridged mode to do my traffic > > shaping. It would simply fit right in front of the router and handle the > > shaping transparently. Jason special built a box like that for one of > > our clients that was having some QoS issues - mainly due to the mixing > > of VPN in with his VoIP and all connected via TimeWarner Cable. > > I'm not using it in any kind of 'production' environment, however this is the > setup I use at home - OpenBSD running on an older Alpha. It works quite well, > and personally I prefer pf over iptables. Feel free to ask me off-list for an > example of the rules I use. > Come on... share those rule sets... I won't tell anyone. :-) >>wink<< >>wink<< <<knudge>> <<knudge>>
But seriously, folks are more likely to want to use PF and OpenBSD if they have an example that leads them to a desirable goal. Thanks - Jon -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
