The trademark restriction tells that modified versions of Mozilla's applications cannot bear the same name as the original ones. It is perfectly fine. It is only enforcing the trademark so that Mozilla's products can be properly identified (the whole objective of the trademark law). The same kind of restriction applies if you want to sell Mozilla's application, i.e., you must rename them. As Brett Smith says, this looks abusive. I wonder what qualifies as selling though. You can buy many magazines with Firefox or Thunderbird included on the CD that goes with it and, AFAIK, Mozilla never has never complained about that.
You can use, study, modify and redistribute Mozilla's products. It is 100%
Free software but recommends non-free software. That is why Trisquel
maintains its own version without this problem.
- [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird asmegir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird asmegir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird gp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird gp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderb... akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thun... gp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thun... akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thun... gp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird xuegfg