On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 00:43 +0100, onp...@gmail.com wrote: > releasing > something under the GPL, but not ever releasing the source, is no different > from using no license at all in practice.
If you're the copyright holder and you release something under the GPL
but refuse to release the source, you never released it under the GPL in
the first place. What you're saying doesn't make sense.
--
Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
