(The article in question is a repost of a "Natural News" article. But, you
can put them in the same bag as the Infowars articles, if you want to. Since,
the editor of "Natural News" is also a volunteer in the Infowars team.)
The people at Infowars may, occasionally, make mistakes (like any other media
organization does). But, they are, most definitively, (much) more trustworthy
than any other US media organization (of the same type) that I know of. (And,
most certainly, don't consciously lie, like most of the other major news
organizations, in that country, do.)
Concerning this report,
It cites what you call "scientific literature", and points to the fact that
other so-called "scientific literature" is funded by the wireless industry.
I don't have time, or patience, to check /everything/ that I read. So, for
the more "normal" subjects, I usually just choose to rely on media
organizations that have proven to be credible, instead of the ones that I've
repeatedly caught lying - and, that I know that are part of the same
industrial interest groups that have to gain with the commercialization of
many products. (Since, I've seen proven examples of how "scientific
literature" can be manipulated by people connected to the same industry that
has to gain with the commercialization of a product -
http://www.naturalnews.com/028194_Scott_Reuben_research_fraud.html)
Concerning the radiation effects,
People, also, already knew, for years, before the actual process by which it
ocurrs was found, that smoking could case lung cancer. And, started advising
others not to smoke, because of that. (But, if people want to wait for the
actual process by which EMR causes brain tumours to be found, before stopping
using their cell phones, then, it's their choice...)
I don't even have to read any scientific data. And, only have to notice what
happens around me, to "highly suspect" (to put it mildly) of this...
I remember, very well, hearing from an electrical engineer, that I know,
years ago, before I even started reading this kind of warnings, how worried
he was that this devices, that emit a radiation so high, that make it
possible to communicate with antennas miles away, were used right next to our
brains, when - he says - that the harmful effects of such type of radiation
on living beings are a well known concern among people who deal with
electrical and radio equipment.
And, like it says in the article, there are countries already starting to
restrict the use of cell phones.
(http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/french-government-bans-advertising-of-mobiles-to-children-1299673.html)
And, it doesn't seem to me that they would be doing this, if there was not a
good reason to be concerned about them.
It has also already been said in the Parliament in my country, by a member of
the Telecommunications Institute, that the EM field of a cell phone can,
indeed, cause cancer.
And, I could go on about this... But, I'll let anyone choose to believe in
the studies they want to...
